God is with us...The Prophecy!

If only the N.Y.T. were this honest.....

If only the N.Y.T. were this honest.....
Read it and Weep Liberals!
Showing posts with label Donald J. Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald J. Trump. Show all posts

Monday, March 6, 2017

A RADICAL MOUSETRAP :The Truth about the current news behind the news! Part I


All through the Election season we heard non-stop talk about RUSSIA, and so far that's all it has amounted too is talk without a drop of proof, evidence or solid facts concerning it. This however does not matter to those who spread lies and innuendo in political fashion, facts can be misleading depending upon who it is that's stating those facts. 

It cannot be denied by any thinking person that the whole mess actually created through Media misinformation, has made the water muddied by facts that do not even matter concerning any of the plain understandings. But once we know just how dishonest and Biased the Media is then things can clear up and the basic honest facts come out clearing up the stories! 

We have to stop trusting what people say is true just because they SAY it, True facts need no fluff to make them more true. Facts should remain as they are without make-up on them. The left likes to build around their ideas with facts but facts that turn out to not have anything in common with the reality at hand. 

So in order to understand a story certain facts build the edifice of the story and cannot be misunderstood, however their are 'injected facts' that are used to make the story unclear, these 'facts' are based upon emotional understandings and preconceived Bias sometimes we just assume certain facts are true because we think that way, these would be political, and emotional mental molds within our makeup. 

The problem with these facts is that they do not always match the solid facts known and thus create an issue where no issue actually exists! So whenever the Media INJECTS their bent into a clear known fact based story they are trying to create a story where there really was no question, it's a way of extending out the simple facts into a conspiracy theory that they pound upon over and over again. Once this narrative is all the Media sees then the actual issue is buried under the dirt of the narrative and lost! 

"Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends,mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which) the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."

And if he did his homework he'd know that Satan LOST his kingdom at the cross and is now ruling as the left does....by deception and lies! 

The above quote is from the Book "Rules For Radicals" by Saul Alinsky the radical who was the darling of the left. Hillary Clinton and Obama both loved this man and it is widely know they followed his teachings both in public and in private life. This man has done more to destroy capitalistic constitutional governments than any other person. 

The fact that he thinks Satan was a radical to admire proves my point that he has improper understanding of Governments. Satan destroys because that's his nature, he steals and Kills because life has no value aside from making him look good, sounds like every politician I've ever come across doesn't it to you?

The Liberal Left in this country has never changed, they still base everything they do around this radical's views. They are 100% UN-American and UN-Constitutional on every ground. There can be no comparable idea contained in these views that goes along with a Free republic.

The real questions should be

 'Why does the Left think they can control a Free people with ideas that fly in the face of human freedom?

Alinsky’s 12 Rules:

1Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.

2. Never go outside the expertise of your people. It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

3. Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

4. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

6. A good tactic is one your people enjoy. They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Don’t become old news.

8. Keep the pressure on. Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

10. If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive. Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

11. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

12. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. 

What you see here are ways AROUND what's normal in discourse jumping to conclusions and insulting your enemy rather than genuinely engaging in discourse under proper rules of making a deal. 

Donald J. Trump is engaging the Left in deal making that genders both sides getting some of what they want and all sides moving forward but the Left will not budge on anything because they want it all, no sharing, no fair trade no exceptions and this is plainly school yard childishness not adult deal making! 

Why isn't the Left held to a constitutional standard like Conservatives are? Nothing in this radical list translates to Constitutional behavior in any way. These behaviors are closer to Losers trying to cover their losses with a win despite the reality!

To read or order David Horowitz's pamphlet, Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Modelclick here.

Below are six ideas, six “rules,” that the Godfather of community organizing packs between the covers of Rules, ideas that Obama’s imbibed hook, line, and sinker.
(1). Politics is all about power relations, but to advance one’s power, one must couch one’s positions in the language of morality.
Community organizers are “political realists” who “see the world as it is: an arena of power politics moved primarily by perceived immediate self-interests, where morality is rhetorical rationale for expedient action and self-interest” (12).
(2). There is only three kinds of people in the world: rich and powerful oppressors, the poor and disenfranchised oppressed, and the middle-class whose apathy perpetuates the status quo.
“The world as it is” is a rather simple world.  From this perspective, the world consists of but three kinds of people: “the Haves, the Have-Nots, and the Have-a-Little, Want Mores.”  The Haves, possessing, as they do, all of “the power, money, food, security, and luxury,” resist the “change” necessary to relieve the Have-Nots of the “poverty, rotten housing, disease, ignorance, political impotence, and despair” from which they suffer (18).
The Have-a-Little, Want Mores comprise what we call “the middle class.”  While Alinsky believes that this group “is the genesis of creativity,” (19) he also claims that it supplies the world with its “Do-Nothings.” The Do-Nothings are those who “profess a commitment to social change for ideals of justice, equality, and opportunity, and then abstain from and discourage all effective action for change [.]”  Alinsky remarks that in spite of their reputable appearances, the Do-Nothings are actually “invidious” (20).
This being so, they are as resistant to change as are the Haves.
(3). Change is brought about through relentless agitation and “trouble making” of a kind that radically disrupts society as it is.  
Since both the middle and upper classes have none of the organizer’s passion for radical change, he must do his best to “stir up dissatisfaction and discontent [.]”  He must “agitate to the point of conflict.”  The organizer “dramatizes…injustices” and engages in “‘trouble making’ by stirring up” just those “angers, frustrations, and resentments” (117) that will eventuate in the “disorganization of the old and organization of the new” (116 emphasis original).  He is determined to give rise to as much “confusion” and “fear” as possible (127).
(4). There can be no conversation between the organizer and his opponents.  The latter must be depicted as being evil.
If his compulsion to “agitate” makes it sound as if the organizer is disinclined to converse with those with whom he disagrees, that is because, well, he is. Alinsky is blunt on this point: “You don’t communicate with anyone purely on the rational facts or ethics of an issue” (89).    It is true that “moral rationalization is indispensable,” (43) that the organizer must “clothe” one’s goals and strategies with “moral arguments” (36). But there can be no conversation with one’s opponents, for to converse with them is to humanize them.
The organizer’s objective is to demonize those who stand in the way of his designs for change.
The reason for this is simple: “Men will act when they are convinced that their cause is 100 per cent on the side of the angels and that the opposition [is] 100 per cent on the side of the devil.” The organizer “knows that there can be no action until issues are polarized to this degree” (78).
Elaborating on this theme, Alinsky asserts that in “charging that so-and-so is a racist bastard and then diluting” this “with qualifying remarks such as ‘He is a good churchgoing man, generous to charity, and a good husband,’” one convicts oneself of “political idiocy” (134).  The winning strategy is to “pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it” (130 emphases original).
(5). The organizer can never focus on just a single issue.  He must move inexhaustibly from one issue to the next. 
The organizer “must develop multiple issues,” (76) for “multiple issues mean constant action and life” (78).  Alinsky explains: “A single issue is a fatal strait jacket that…drastically limits” the organizer’s “appeal,” but “multiple issues…draw in…many potential members essential to the building of a broad, mass-based organization” (120).  The only “way to keep the action going” is by “constantly cutting new issues as the action continues, so that by the time the enthusiasm and the emotions for one issue have started to de-escalate, a new issue” has emerged “with a consequent revival” (161).
(6). Taunt one’s opponents to the point that they label you a “dangerous enemy” of “the establishment.”
Finally, in order “to put the organizer on the side of the people, to identify him with the Have-Nots,” it is imperative that he “maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a ‘dangerous enemy’” (100).
Just because Barack Obama has left behind the low-income Chicago communities in which he once agitated doesn’t mean that he left behind the skills as a community agitator that he learned from Saul Alinsky.  Rather, he now regards the country as his community to organize as he sees fit.
Obama not infrequently invokes American ideals, even while he conspires to “fundamentally transform” America.
In spite of what he says, Obama does not want national unity.  There can be no unity with a people who one wants to fundamentally transform.
The President regularly speaks and acts as if there is perpetual class warfare being waged by “the Haves” on “the Have Nots.”  Indeed, this is what he wants for Americans to believe.  It is this desire on his part that accounts for why he spares no occasion to demonize both “the richest one percent” who he accuses of refusing to pay “their fair share,” as well as those Republicans who threaten to impede his plans to raise taxes.
Again, Obama does not want unity.  He wants division.
Obama constantly moves from one divisive issue to the next, from Obamacare to gun-control, from amnesty for illegal immigrants to support for “same-sex marriage.”  We see now why this is so.
Obama does not want unity.  He wants to keep the country as polarized and disoriented as possible.
To know why Obama speaks and acts as he does, we need to know about Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

Updating Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" for the Trump Era

Its funny really just how far away from real protesting we've come, since the 60's protesting has developed into nothing more than an excuse for basement dwellers to come out and break stuff. Not one of these protesters knows anything about real history or for that matter politics in general.
The following are OUR arguments in favor of what Trump has done and the Left's sad understanding of reality!

So far the Left has been 100% wrong 100% of the time, so where does that place the argument? 
Why do we as Americans accept the anti-free speech activists as legitimate protesters who demand their speech but deny others that right?
Leftists fail the Laws of Logic and simple decorum, they haven't got a clue what freedom and liberty means. 
Chanting is NOT an argument!
Swearing and spitting is not an argument!
Burning the American flag that I and millions of others served to protect is not an argument! 

It shouldn't be very hard to understand just what President Donald J. Trump is up against. He is fighting the entire New World Order establishment, an edifice that has existed for well over 300 years and destroyed many established Nations in that time! And no it hasn't been called Liberal, Democratic or Communist those are merely political call words that they have USED over the decades to do their bidding. They are the Masters of what the Left terms protesters which in reality are paid rioters to cause division and chaos.
The Leftist Media is also paid to turn a blind eye to everything even resembling the America we have lost, so nothing that Trump says or does no matter how good for us it may be has a chance of passing muster.
Donald J. Trump is a good man with the best intentions for America, but to the Liberal, the uninformed voter, and the establishment political hacks surviving upon the crumbs from the masters table it is Trump that made their life hell. They have been brainwashed into an alternate reality where Trump becomes the embodiment of evil and destruction.

 The opposite is of course true, but their perceptions have been predetermined and set in stone, they are truly unable to reason logically about reality. Trust me its been done over and over, they constantly lose the argument about which they believe is true!

 PART 2 of this will deal with the Major differences between Capitalistic and Socialistic societies and the reasons that Socialism never works ANYWHERE it's attempted. These arguments will be the foundations on which we Make America Great Again and end socialistic nightmares around the globe.
Just in case there's someone among the Left who finds it in their heart to learn, to listen and thereby free themselves from the bondage of Social ideas!

Monday, January 30, 2017

What Muslim Ban? More Fake news about a fake religious ban when it's really just a terror ban!

Both Twitter and Facebook are alive with FALSE NEWS STORIES from ill informed and a few just stupid people who spread lies like the fools they are!

It is amazing to me viewing the dumb Tweets and down right ignorant postings on Facebook regarding President Trumps attempt to PROTECT America from Terrorism but knowing Liberals as I do it isn't a big surprise either. Looking at the BIG picture is not their strong suit, they love to invent ideas and twist known historical events into shadows of what they really were. They play with history like they play with reality putting little attention to known facts but rather wallowing in lies and innuendo! 

The current BAN as it's called is NOT a ban on Muslim's or a Religion, that's the great lie being promoted by the Fake Media elites to twist it's real purpose of Protecting us UNTIL A PROPER VETTING PROCESS CAN BE PUT TOGETHER. This is the actual purpose of the TEMPORARY BAN yes I said Temporary, all this crying and whining by these liberal morons just makes this all the more pitiful on their part!



"You will search the Executive Order in vain for mentions of Islam, or any other religion. By Sunday morning, the media began suffering acute attacks of honesty and writing headlines such as “Trump’s Latest Executive Order: Banning People From 7 Countries and More” 

The liberals are marching their fake stories before the public just as they always do, nothing has changed. Watch the poor VICTIMS of the bully Donald Trump!

But as usual with any Liberal cry baby made up story the TRUTH is revealing if you want it!

Statement By Secretary John Kelly On The Entry Of Lawful Permanent Residents Into The United States

Release Date: 

January 29, 2017
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
Contact: 202-282-8010
WASHINGTON – In applying the provisions of the president's executive order, I hereby deem the entry of lawful permanent residents to be in the national interest.
Accordingly, absent the receipt of significant derogatory information indicating a serious threat to public safety and welfare, lawful permanent resident status will be a dis-positive factor in our case-by-case determinations.
All along this wasn't any where near as bad as these snowflakes have made it but that never derails an agenda for Liberals does it? This is not a ban against ALL MUSLIMS, it's simply a ban against Terrorist related countries PROVEN to be hot beds of terror groups. This is required if proper vetting is ever to take place. President Obama did the exact same thing in 2011.


"As a result of the Kentucky case, the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months in 2011, federal officials told ABC News – even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets. One Iraqi who had aided American troops was assassinated before his refugee application could be processed, because of the immigration delays, two U.S. officials said. In 2011, fewer than 10,000 Iraqis were resettled as refugees in the U.S., half the number from the year before, State Department statistics show."

Despite what Liberals say this is exactly the same idea and for the same reasons as in 2011, they know it, it seems that Liberals like to forget their actions when accusing others of wrong doing when they did the same thing.


FROM Breitbart NEWS:

The order is based on security reviews conducted by President Barack Obama’s deputies. 
As White House counselor Kellyanne Conway pointed out on “Fox News Sunday,” the seven nations named in Trump’s executive order are drawn from the Terrorist Prevention Act of 2015. The 2015 “Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015” named Iraq, Iran, Sudan, and Syria, while its 2016 update added Libya, Somalia, and Yemen.
“These are countries that have a history of training, harboring, exporting terrorists. We can’t keep pretending and looking the other way,” said Conway.

The moratorium is largely temporary. 

Citizens of the seven countries named as security risks are banned from entering the United States for the next 90 days. Refugee processing is halted for 120 days. The longest-lived aspect of the ban may prove to be the halt on Syrian refugees, but that isn’t given a time frame at all. It will last “until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure that admission of Syrian refugees is consistent with the national interest,” as President Trump wrote.
4. Obama banned immigration from Iraq, and Carter banned it from Iran.
“Fact-checking” website PolitiFact twists itself into knots to avoid giving a “true” rating to the absolutely true fact that Jimmy Carter banned Iranian immigration in 1980, unless applicants could prove they were enemies of the Khomenei theocracy.

One of Politifact’s phony talking points states that Carter “acted against Iranian nationals, not an entire religion.” As noted above, Trump’s Executive Order is precisely the same – it does not act against an “entire religion,” it names seven countries.
As for Barack Obama, he did indeed ban immigration from Iraq, for much longer than Trump’s order bans it from the seven listed nations, and none of the people melting down today uttered a peep of protest. Richard Grenell summed it up perfectly in a Tweet:

Obama took 6 months to review screening for 1 country. Trump will take 3 months for 7 countries.  @realDonaldTrump

Trump’s refugee caps are comparable to Obama’s pre-2016 practices:
 David French, who was touted as a spoiler candidate to keep Donald Trump out of the White House during the presidential campaign – in other words, not a big Trump fan – wrote a lengthy and clear-headed analysis of the Executive Order for National ReviewHe noted that after the moratorium ends in 120 days, Trump caps refugee admissions at 50,000 per year… which is roughly the same as President Obama’s admissions in 2011 and 2012, and not far below the 70,000 per year cap in place from 2013 to 2015.
Obama had fairly low caps on refugees during the worst years of the Syrian civil war. He didn’t throw open the doors to mass refugee admissions until his final year in office. Depending on how Trump’s review of Syrian refugee policy turns out, he’s doing little more than returning admissions to normal levels after a four-month pause for security reviews.
 The Executive Order is legal: 
Those invoking the Constitution to attack Trump’s order are simply embarrassing themselves. The President has clear statutory authority to take these actions. As noted, his predecessors did so, without much controversy.
Most of the legal arguments against Trump’s order summarized by USA Today are entirely specious, such as attacking him for “banning an entire religion,” which the order manifestly does not do. Critics of the order have a political opinion that it will in effect “ban Muslims,” but that’s not what it says. Designating specific nations as trouble spots and ordering a pause is entirely within the President’s authority, and there is ample precedent to prove it.
It should be possible to argue with the reasoning behind the order, or argue that it will have negative unintended consequences, without advancing hollow legal arguments. Of course, this is America 2017, so a wave of lawsuits will soon be sloshing through the courts.

This Executive Order is a security measure, not an arbitrary expression of supposed xenophobia. 
Conway stressed the need to enhance immigration security from trouble spots in her “Fox News Sunday” interview. French also addressed the subject in his post:
When we know our enemy is seeking to strike America and its allies through the refugee population, when we know they’ve succeeded in Europe, and when the administration has doubts about our ability to adequately vet the refugees we admit into this nation, a pause is again not just prudent but arguably necessary. It is important that we provide sufficient aid and protection to keep refugees safe and healthy in place, but it is not necessary to bring Syrians to the United States to fulfill our vital moral obligations.
French’s major objection to the Executive Order is that applying it to green-card holders is “madness,” but unfortunately many of the terrorists who attacked Americans during the Obama years were green-card holders. Daniel Horowitz and Chris Pandolfo addressed that subject at Conservative Review:
Both liberals and conservatives expressed concern over hundreds of individuals going over to fight for ISIS. We are already limited in how we can combat this growing threat among U.S. citizens. Given that it is completely legal to exclude non-citizens upon re-entry, Trump extended the ban to legal permanent residents as well.
If a Somali refugee is travelling back to Somalia (so much for credible fear of persecution!), government officials should have the ability to prevent that person from coming back when necessary. Obviously, there are some individuals from these seven countries who already have green cards and we might not want to exclude. That is why the order grants discretion to the State Department to issue case-by-case exemptions for “religious persecution, “or when the person is already in transit and denying admission would cause undue hardship.” A CBP agent is always stationed at any international airport from which these individuals would board a direct flight to the United States (Paris and Dubai, for example). That individual would not allow anyone covered by this ban onto a U.S.-bound flight unless he grants them a hardship exemption.
Indeed, it appears that green card holders returning yesterday from those seven countries were all granted entry.
Because he is a progressive globalist, Obama deliberately blinded us to security threats, in the name of political correctness and left-wing ideology. Ninety or 120 days isn’t much time for Trump to turn all that around, especially because it is unlikely much will change in the seven countries Trump named.
The hysterical reaction to Trump’s order illustrates the very thing that worries advocates of strong immigration security: Americans’ security is the lowest priority, far below progressive ideology, crass political opportunism, and emotional theater.
We’re being effectively told by the theatrical class to tolerate a certain amount of Islamic terrorism because their feelings would be hurt by the tough measures we need protest ourselves from a tough enemy. But this time, President Trump is proving tough enough to push our security up into the top priority.
In other words if Liberals would do a little thing called 'Homework' they would have nothing to complain about, but we all know that liberals use jumping the gun as a weapon in their war on American freedom. They pander to anti-American groups like the Anarchists, Communists, and other Socialist groups.....SO I ASK YOU WHO HAS THEIR BEST INTERESTS IN YOUR FAVOR AMERICA, TRUMP OR THEM?

What Trump Has Achieved Through the (Not) #MuslimBan

Donald J. Trump has delivered and delivered without fear for us so let's support this great President in every way till this liberal nightmare breaks into a great American millennium! 
Pass this on and make Viral!!!!

Total Pageviews

I'm a proud Conservative

"Yes I do proudly support Donald J. Trump for President, I am a Christian something I'm even more proud of. I believe that Donald Trump's policies will make America Great Again and the dream of American prosperity a real tangible thing again.

We have lost the ability to do great things because we have lost our faith in God and our founding principles. It's really not hard to support the best choice that's a no brainier, it's also not hard to support the WRONG choice because we base choice not on facts in front of us but make it based upon the PUSH from Left or from the Right, I say decide based upon contextual facts, in-depth study and pure common sense something the establishment doesn't utilize!

Support This Ministry- Check Out These Sites!

My photo

Before you look at the links below know this about me, I do not know everything about anything, I know only what God has revealed to me.

Proving God exists CANNOT be done for the person who is not open to hearing and seeing the evidence as God sees it. Faith is the KEY to releasing all the evidence contained in creation, in man's heart and his mind. Without FAITH no one can ever please God so to throw away faith as unimportant destroys our receptivity to the evidence!

I was a hypocrite, a sinner and a fool, sometimes even as a believer but as long as God is in control I'm forgiven and healed of every form of human shortcoming. Nothing can stand before the evidence contained in Faith.....NOTHING!







Overall rating

Translate This Blog

The COMPLETE story about Hillary's E-Mail Scandel !