Unacceptical Debt Unacceptical Excuses!

national debt

Video Bar

Loading...

God is with us...The Prophecy!

If only the N.Y.T. were this honest.....

If only the N.Y.T. were this honest.....
Read it and Weep Liberals!

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

FLASH BACK: Election fraud and Leftwing lies about the Truth Part 1






Since the beginning of the election season liberal scoffers and other assorted idiots have been in permanent denial mode on just about anything Trump tweets or says. Its funny they never doubted a thing Obama said or did no matter how controversial or untrue it might have been!






 in an opinion article he wrote for Mediaite on January 24th, 2017 had the following headline: 

Here is the Proof that Trump is Indeed Lying about Illegal Voting 

Aside from the obviousness of the clear biased Leftwing slant that couldn't accept truth if it were right in front of him (Which it is by the way) this article is not Proof in any way, shape or form of said argument. The real problem is that the left needs so little fact based proof it's almost a joke to think they do. If you as a Conservative say the sky is blue they'll say your crazy and present scientific proof that the sky is really purple all you have to do is SQUINT just right! 

"President Trump (that still feels way weirder than writing 2017 on a check) apparently shocked congressional leaders yesterday by claiming, in an extended riff, that he only lost the popular vote because of between three and five million votes which were cast illegally. The reaction to this has been strong and bipartisan, with both Republican Lindsey Graham calling him out and the liberal New York Times openly referring to this assertion as a lie."

FUNNY HOW THAT JUMPED!



First of all the only Shock involved in his statement is the fact it took this long for a President to finally grow a pair and admit the truth about out fixed and rigged election edifice. And yes the same Left that now cry's foul concerning the cheating, said exactly the same thing in the past but somehow can't get past the shear obviousness plainly in their faces.

It must be understood that DENIAL isn't an argument, it doesn't prove anything to say it didn't happen. They lack the volume of evidence it requires to prove their denial means anything more than simple schoolyard bullying tactics.

 Bullies always deny what their victims tell them about their actions, never admitting that their bullies. The left has become the schoolyard equivalent of political bullies who cannot accept anything outside the bubble of their limited reason and logic! And believe me they actually think this way normally it is a permanent brain disorder brought on by constantly hearing the same lie over and over again.



The following rant proves nothing outside a delusional logic that surpasses all reasonable attempts at truth.

"If Trump really thinks that about 3% of the votes in a presidential election were cast illegally, why in the world is he not making massive election reform a high priority in his administration? If this is really the case, then he and every other Republican should be screaming it from the mountain top because it means that our elections are a complete sham and that the GOP majorities, especially in the House of Representatives, should be significantly larger. Who paid off Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan to stay completely quiet about this huge scandal?!"



Does he really believe that this is in any way proof that Illegals didn't vote in the election? Really? This is the all consuming evidence we have waited to hear?

Most of the GOP is lined with progressive establishment types that fully agree with the left sided views that are destroying our country, I don't think anyone with a brain to think for themselves could ever deny that fact! So to allude to this pathetic line of reasoning is indeed totally left brain stupidity.

Notice, that across all the media outlets, everyone is on the exact same page in their panicked rush to shut down debate by declaring Trump a liar, and a liar with "zero evidence."

He then drones on about other so-called evidence based on how voting works in the real world of California politics and if you are not careful you'll fall for his delusional logic. It sounds good until you find out the facts behind the voter laws.

" You see, apparently Trump doesn't realize how congressional elections work and why their results are literally the perfect proof that there is no issue of massive voting by illegal immigrants who supposedly would have an extreme animus towards Trump (even though he will likely be no tougher on the vast majority of them than Barack (His Spelling not mine) Obama was)."

The left loves to wrap itself in this matter of factualness and popular opinion when in reality they twist the facts to suit their agenda not to reveal anything new but to present old news as if it's current fact. You see the way things are supposed to work by Law and the way they twist the Law to work in their favor are two very different animals.

"Each congressional district in a state has effectively the same number of people (not citizens), regardless of their eligibility to vote. This means that by comparing turnout in congressional districts with little or no illegal immigrants, with districts which have a high percentage of people who are likely in the country illegally, it can provide us with tremendous evidence as to whether there is a large “illegal voter” problem."

FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES  - The Washington Times - Thursday, January 26, 2017

CNN’s Jake Tapper called it “a stunning allegation for which the White House is providing no evidence. And there is a reason they are providing no evidence — there is no evidence. It is not true.”

"Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud.
Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion.
Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump."
Now correct me if I'm missing something, something big here but can the left actually look at these facts and admit they might be wrong even a little bit? Why no of course not, that would take introspection of a kind Liberals don't understand nor can they process such reaction. 

Most of the following in the left are ignorant of such facts because they are told what to think, and how to think it without evidence ever entering the picture. They assume their right no matter how contrary the facts become, doubling down is the natural reaction to evidence against their facts!

"Three professors at Old Dominion University — Mr. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha and David C. Earnest — took these answers, did further research and extrapolated that of a 19.4 million estimate of adult non-citizens, about 620,000 were illegally registered to vote in the 2008 presidential election. Using other measuring tools, they said, the actual number of non-citizen voters could be as low as 38,000 and as high as 2.8 million.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 2012 that there are 22 million non-citizens in the country. The group comprises illegal immigrants and people in the U.S. legally on a visa or permanent resident green card. Of this 22 million, 20 million were 18 or older, the U.S.voting age requirement."

But the real point here is not the numbers being perfect but the fact of the fraud itself, even ONE illegal vote is a crime and for good reason, we can only guess in some cases as to how many are voting but one fact is clear they vote entirely for Liberal Democrats and that is suspect in and of itself. It's like its own voting block ready and waiting for an election to happen.

Denial only makes those who deny look dumb and flippant rather than factual. Going into long drawn out stretches of fancy are a Liberal trait since decades past. There really is "Nothing new under the sun" as Solomon rightly stated and Liberals are not going to change that fact!


 "The Worst People In the World (our media) are choosing to completely ignore a 2014 study that claimed millions of illegals might indeed be voting.

 This is not some crank study.

 No less than the leftwing Washington Post found it worthy enough to publish just a little over two years ago:

In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races. …
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.
It is a fascinating study based on something called "self-reporting," which means that non-citizens admitted to voting illegally. And the study was conducted by…
Jesse Richman is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Director of the ODU Social Science Research Center. David Earnest is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters."

"So let's quickly connect the dots…

1. Even though poll after poll shows that huge majorities of Americans believe a valid ID should be required to vote, our media and Democrats are willing to die on a hill to fight this common sense safeguard.
Why?
2. Any attempt to clean up outdated voter rolls is fought by these same people on that same hill. Which means who knows how many dead voters remain on voter rolls, which means that without an ID you can vote by claiming to be that person.
Why?
3. This Wall of Unified Media Lies that immediately goes up to silence anyone who brings up vote fraud is un-American.  And the bricks in this wall reek of fascism: 
DEBUNKED! DANGEROUS! RACIST! NO EVIDENCE! LIAR! SHUT UP! The only problem is it's THEIR EVIDENCE of Vote Fraud!
Why deny your own study now?
Me? I don't know how many illegals voted in 2016. And neither does the national media. The only difference between us, is that I would like to find out they just want to deny it exists but not back in 2014 because they were trying to prove WE DID IT THEN. The problem with that reasoning is that the issue doesn't change over time it only becomes worse!

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

THE RADICAL MOUSETRAP: Defining the Socialist Left against what always works...Capitalism! PART 2


Just what is so important about Socialism that we would sacrifice all that we know is true about Conservative principles?

This might seem like a strange question but it really isn't, because American's seem to be listening in large numbers to these UN-American principles PRESENTED IN MASS BY RIOTERS across the country. And they are UN-American to the core no matter how legitimate they might be made to sound! Any form of Socialism is a failed system under constitutional government, like Oil mixing with Water; Socialism cannot mix with a freedom and Liberty form of government.



This case about the Immigration Law signed by the President is proof that America is ignorant from Top to bottom about our History and Laws. US Code is VERY CLEAR about the Presidents right to close the boarders of the US anytime he sees danger from the enterer being bad for out safety. This code above has nothing in it that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL in any way shape or form, Judges must ignore plain language that agrees with his actions in order to bypass that language in favor of Illegal law breaking.

The 9th and 4th circuit courts are filled with Socialist Judges who do not respect the Constitution nor our Laws as written. 

Why did this happen?

 How could these Judges get through the process knowing their beliefs? 

The President or officials involved must have know their bent when putting them there, right? 

Well knowing that doesn't it then follow that some of the Presidents and leaders we THINK were conservative or Democratic in belief are far from that in reality? 

Are they not rather secret Socialist infiltrators who were put in place to cause the very thing we see today. What used to be termed 'Conspiracy Theory' is now reality as information on these structures in our government come out more clearly our President is truly in a battle against enemies from within our own government!




   




This nation was founded upon the opposite of where we find ourselves now. No matter who the Left thinks we are we are exactly the opposite. Their ideals are anything but ideal.







Socialism refers to a broad array of doctrines or political movements that envisage a socio-economic system in which the ownership of industry and the distribution of wealth are determined by the state or by agents of the state or the collective. 

In its most general sense, socialism seeks the co-prosperity and common cause of all people, which could be accomplished without force in religious and Utopian communities. But, in general practice, it refers to the use of state force to redistribute wealth.

And guess what? Obama told us these exact same things before he became President and we ignored his warnings, why is that exactly?






Capital (or the "means of production") is owned, operated, and traded in order to generate profits for private owners or shareholders.

Laissez-faire means to "let it be"; opposed to government intervention in economics because capitalists believe it introduces inefficiencies. A free market produces the best economic outcome for any society. Government should not pick winners and losers as Obama has done the past 8 years.

 The emphasis is on individual profit rather than on workers or society as a whole. No restriction on who may own capital thus ALL can have the same potential to get wealth. Capitalism deals fairly with wealth UNLESS a little socialism is transplanted in it then it becomes Crony Capitalism using some of one a little of the other, this always leads to Socialism and Communism!


While Socialism believes that from each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution. Emphasis on profit being distributed among the society or workforce to complement individual wages/salaries.

All individuals should have access to basic articles of consumption and public goods to allow for self-actualization. Large-scale industries are collective efforts and thus the returns from these industries must benefit society as a whole.



This all sounds good until the leaders get greedy, which always happens and steal all the power after having destroyed the state turning it into a hell hole! 



This is always the legacy of Socialism without exception just as it is the legacy of crony capitalism to create all the right conditions for its takeover. Donald J. Trump came along just in time before this was to occur, God's timing is perfect!

The President believes as we all should that Competition for ownership of capital drives economic activity & creates a price system that determines resource allocation; profits are reinvested in the economy. "Production for profit": useful goods and services are a byproduct of pursuing profit. We as a nation began as a democratic republic built upon these principles of Constitutional government.



The obvious issues with Socialism tend to focus on three factors: the loss of individual freedom and rights through Big Government takeover, the inefficiency of planned or controlled economies because nothing can be totally controlled, and the inability to establish the constructs socialism theorizes are ideal because they simply do not exist unless we lived in a perfect world; which we do not. Man is fallen filled with wickedness and unable to build anything perfect.


That is why God lead us to develop a more perfect union under his guidance, a Nation established under freedom and Liberty, a republic that has endured every thing thrown at it and will continue to endure long into the future. 

Monday, March 6, 2017

A RADICAL MOUSETRAP :The Truth about the current news behind the news! Part I

A RADICAL MOUSETRAP!





All through the Election season we heard non-stop talk about RUSSIA, and so far that's all it has amounted too is talk without a drop of proof, evidence or solid facts concerning it. This however does not matter to those who spread lies and innuendo in political fashion, facts can be misleading depending upon who it is that's stating those facts. 

It cannot be denied by any thinking person that the whole mess actually created through Media misinformation, has made the water muddied by facts that do not even matter concerning any of the plain understandings. But once we know just how dishonest and Biased the Media is then things can clear up and the basic honest facts come out clearing up the stories! 

We have to stop trusting what people say is true just because they SAY it, True facts need no fluff to make them more true. Facts should remain as they are without make-up on them. The left likes to build around their ideas with facts but facts that turn out to not have anything in common with the reality at hand. 

So in order to understand a story certain facts build the edifice of the story and cannot be misunderstood, however their are 'injected facts' that are used to make the story unclear, these 'facts' are based upon emotional understandings and preconceived Bias sometimes we just assume certain facts are true because we think that way, these would be political, and emotional mental molds within our makeup. 

The problem with these facts is that they do not always match the solid facts known and thus create an issue where no issue actually exists! So whenever the Media INJECTS their bent into a clear known fact based story they are trying to create a story where there really was no question, it's a way of extending out the simple facts into a conspiracy theory that they pound upon over and over again. Once this narrative is all the Media sees then the actual issue is buried under the dirt of the narrative and lost! 


"Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends,mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which) the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."
—SAUL ALINSKY

And if he did his homework he'd know that Satan LOST his kingdom at the cross and is now ruling as the left does....by deception and lies! 

The above quote is from the Book "Rules For Radicals" by Saul Alinsky the radical who was the darling of the left. Hillary Clinton and Obama both loved this man and it is widely know they followed his teachings both in public and in private life. This man has done more to destroy capitalistic constitutional governments than any other person. 

The fact that he thinks Satan was a radical to admire proves my point that he has improper understanding of Governments. Satan destroys because that's his nature, he steals and Kills because life has no value aside from making him look good, sounds like every politician I've ever come across doesn't it to you?




The Liberal Left in this country has never changed, they still base everything they do around this radical's views. They are 100% UN-American and UN-Constitutional on every ground. There can be no comparable idea contained in these views that goes along with a Free republic.

The real questions should be

 'Why does the Left think they can control a Free people with ideas that fly in the face of human freedom?

Alinsky’s 12 Rules:


1Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.

2. Never go outside the expertise of your people. It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

3. Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

4. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

6. A good tactic is one your people enjoy. They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Don’t become old news.

8. Keep the pressure on. Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

10. If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive. Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

11. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

12. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. 

What you see here are ways AROUND what's normal in discourse jumping to conclusions and insulting your enemy rather than genuinely engaging in discourse under proper rules of making a deal. 

Donald J. Trump is engaging the Left in deal making that genders both sides getting some of what they want and all sides moving forward but the Left will not budge on anything because they want it all, no sharing, no fair trade no exceptions and this is plainly school yard childishness not adult deal making! 

Why isn't the Left held to a constitutional standard like Conservatives are? Nothing in this radical list translates to Constitutional behavior in any way. These behaviors are closer to Losers trying to cover their losses with a win despite the reality!

To read or order David Horowitz's pamphlet, Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Modelclick here.

Below are six ideas, six “rules,” that the Godfather of community organizing packs between the covers of Rules, ideas that Obama’s imbibed hook, line, and sinker.
(1). Politics is all about power relations, but to advance one’s power, one must couch one’s positions in the language of morality.
Community organizers are “political realists” who “see the world as it is: an arena of power politics moved primarily by perceived immediate self-interests, where morality is rhetorical rationale for expedient action and self-interest” (12).
(2). There is only three kinds of people in the world: rich and powerful oppressors, the poor and disenfranchised oppressed, and the middle-class whose apathy perpetuates the status quo.
“The world as it is” is a rather simple world.  From this perspective, the world consists of but three kinds of people: “the Haves, the Have-Nots, and the Have-a-Little, Want Mores.”  The Haves, possessing, as they do, all of “the power, money, food, security, and luxury,” resist the “change” necessary to relieve the Have-Nots of the “poverty, rotten housing, disease, ignorance, political impotence, and despair” from which they suffer (18).
The Have-a-Little, Want Mores comprise what we call “the middle class.”  While Alinsky believes that this group “is the genesis of creativity,” (19) he also claims that it supplies the world with its “Do-Nothings.” The Do-Nothings are those who “profess a commitment to social change for ideals of justice, equality, and opportunity, and then abstain from and discourage all effective action for change [.]”  Alinsky remarks that in spite of their reputable appearances, the Do-Nothings are actually “invidious” (20).
This being so, they are as resistant to change as are the Haves.
(3). Change is brought about through relentless agitation and “trouble making” of a kind that radically disrupts society as it is.  
Since both the middle and upper classes have none of the organizer’s passion for radical change, he must do his best to “stir up dissatisfaction and discontent [.]”  He must “agitate to the point of conflict.”  The organizer “dramatizes…injustices” and engages in “‘trouble making’ by stirring up” just those “angers, frustrations, and resentments” (117) that will eventuate in the “disorganization of the old and organization of the new” (116 emphasis original).  He is determined to give rise to as much “confusion” and “fear” as possible (127).
(4). There can be no conversation between the organizer and his opponents.  The latter must be depicted as being evil.
If his compulsion to “agitate” makes it sound as if the organizer is disinclined to converse with those with whom he disagrees, that is because, well, he is. Alinsky is blunt on this point: “You don’t communicate with anyone purely on the rational facts or ethics of an issue” (89).    It is true that “moral rationalization is indispensable,” (43) that the organizer must “clothe” one’s goals and strategies with “moral arguments” (36). But there can be no conversation with one’s opponents, for to converse with them is to humanize them.
The organizer’s objective is to demonize those who stand in the way of his designs for change.
The reason for this is simple: “Men will act when they are convinced that their cause is 100 per cent on the side of the angels and that the opposition [is] 100 per cent on the side of the devil.” The organizer “knows that there can be no action until issues are polarized to this degree” (78).
Elaborating on this theme, Alinsky asserts that in “charging that so-and-so is a racist bastard and then diluting” this “with qualifying remarks such as ‘He is a good churchgoing man, generous to charity, and a good husband,’” one convicts oneself of “political idiocy” (134).  The winning strategy is to “pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it” (130 emphases original).
(5). The organizer can never focus on just a single issue.  He must move inexhaustibly from one issue to the next. 
The organizer “must develop multiple issues,” (76) for “multiple issues mean constant action and life” (78).  Alinsky explains: “A single issue is a fatal strait jacket that…drastically limits” the organizer’s “appeal,” but “multiple issues…draw in…many potential members essential to the building of a broad, mass-based organization” (120).  The only “way to keep the action going” is by “constantly cutting new issues as the action continues, so that by the time the enthusiasm and the emotions for one issue have started to de-escalate, a new issue” has emerged “with a consequent revival” (161).
(6). Taunt one’s opponents to the point that they label you a “dangerous enemy” of “the establishment.”
Finally, in order “to put the organizer on the side of the people, to identify him with the Have-Nots,” it is imperative that he “maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a ‘dangerous enemy’” (100).
Just because Barack Obama has left behind the low-income Chicago communities in which he once agitated doesn’t mean that he left behind the skills as a community agitator that he learned from Saul Alinsky.  Rather, he now regards the country as his community to organize as he sees fit.
Obama not infrequently invokes American ideals, even while he conspires to “fundamentally transform” America.
In spite of what he says, Obama does not want national unity.  There can be no unity with a people who one wants to fundamentally transform.
The President regularly speaks and acts as if there is perpetual class warfare being waged by “the Haves” on “the Have Nots.”  Indeed, this is what he wants for Americans to believe.  It is this desire on his part that accounts for why he spares no occasion to demonize both “the richest one percent” who he accuses of refusing to pay “their fair share,” as well as those Republicans who threaten to impede his plans to raise taxes.
Again, Obama does not want unity.  He wants division.
Obama constantly moves from one divisive issue to the next, from Obamacare to gun-control, from amnesty for illegal immigrants to support for “same-sex marriage.”  We see now why this is so.
Obama does not want unity.  He wants to keep the country as polarized and disoriented as possible.
To know why Obama speaks and acts as he does, we need to know about Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

CLICK THE LINK BELOW FOR A GOOD ARTICLE ON THIS SUBJECT!
Updating Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" for the Trump Era

Its funny really just how far away from real protesting we've come, since the 60's protesting has developed into nothing more than an excuse for basement dwellers to come out and break stuff. Not one of these protesters knows anything about real history or for that matter politics in general.
The following are OUR arguments in favor of what Trump has done and the Left's sad understanding of reality!

So far the Left has been 100% wrong 100% of the time, so where does that place the argument? 
Why do we as Americans accept the anti-free speech activists as legitimate protesters who demand their speech but deny others that right?
Leftists fail the Laws of Logic and simple decorum, they haven't got a clue what freedom and liberty means. 
Chanting is NOT an argument!
Swearing and spitting is not an argument!
Burning the American flag that I and millions of others served to protect is not an argument! 

It shouldn't be very hard to understand just what President Donald J. Trump is up against. He is fighting the entire New World Order establishment, an edifice that has existed for well over 300 years and destroyed many established Nations in that time! And no it hasn't been called Liberal, Democratic or Communist those are merely political call words that they have USED over the decades to do their bidding. They are the Masters of what the Left terms protesters which in reality are paid rioters to cause division and chaos.
The Leftist Media is also paid to turn a blind eye to everything even resembling the America we have lost, so nothing that Trump says or does no matter how good for us it may be has a chance of passing muster.
  
Donald J. Trump is a good man with the best intentions for America, but to the Liberal, the uninformed voter, and the establishment political hacks surviving upon the crumbs from the masters table it is Trump that made their life hell. They have been brainwashed into an alternate reality where Trump becomes the embodiment of evil and destruction.

 The opposite is of course true, but their perceptions have been predetermined and set in stone, they are truly unable to reason logically about reality. Trust me its been done over and over, they constantly lose the argument about which they believe is true!


 PART 2 of this will deal with the Major differences between Capitalistic and Socialistic societies and the reasons that Socialism never works ANYWHERE it's attempted. These arguments will be the foundations on which we Make America Great Again and end socialistic nightmares around the globe.
Just in case there's someone among the Left who finds it in their heart to learn, to listen and thereby free themselves from the bondage of Social ideas!

Total Pageviews

I'm a proud Conservative

"Yes I do proudly support Donald J. Trump for President, I am a Christian something I'm even more proud of. I believe that Donald Trump's policies will make America Great Again and the dream of American prosperity a real tangible thing again.

We have lost the ability to do great things because we have lost our faith in God and our founding principles. It's really not hard to support the best choice that's a no brainier, it's also not hard to support the WRONG choice because we base choice not on facts in front of us but make it based upon the PUSH from Left or from the Right, I say decide based upon contextual facts, in-depth study and pure common sense something the establishment doesn't utilize!

Support This Ministry- Check Out These Sites!

My photo

Before you look at the links below know this about me, I do not know everything about anything, I know only what God has revealed to me.

Proving God exists CANNOT be done for the person who is not open to hearing and seeing the evidence as God sees it. Faith is the KEY to releasing all the evidence contained in creation, in man's heart and his mind. Without FAITH no one can ever please God so to throw away faith as unimportant destroys our receptivity to the evidence!

I was a hypocrite, a sinner and a fool, sometimes even as a believer but as long as God is in control I'm forgiven and healed of every form of human shortcoming. Nothing can stand before the evidence contained in Faith.....NOTHING!


LEARN MORE ABOUT ME AND MY MINISTRY HERE!

http://hopefromdispair.blogspot.com/

http://skepticalofskepticism.blogspot.com/

http://truthinprophecy.blogspot.com/

http://affiliatesgoldenchest.blogspot.com/

http://endwashingtonwaste.blogspot.com/

http://alltheusefulidiots.blogspot.com/
WebRep
Overall rating
 

Translate This Blog

The COMPLETE story about Hillary's E-Mail Scandel !